7 comments

  • ijustlovemath 50 minutes ago
    Automated glucose control will be the next frontier in so many areas of healthcare. I'm still skeptical that anyone will be able to noninvasively and accurately sense blood sugar, but I'm glad people (especially kids with T1) will have one more tool to help them. I hope they can figure out the reimbursement side to get it into the most hands possible!
  • imglorp 23 minutes ago
    What about all the other wearable sensors like

    https://www.stelo.com

    https://www.hellolingo.com

    • ijustlovemath 3 minutes ago
      The difference is that these only measure blood sugar, while the new system also measures ketones, of keto diet fame, which are leading indicators of a really dangerous situation called diabetic ketoacidosis. It's treatable with a hospitalized IV insulin drip, but can be avoided if you have some advance notice.
    • Someone 10 minutes ago
      Those ‘only’ measure glucose levels. As the article says, this is the first approved device that monitors both ketone and glucose levels.
    • jvanderbot 6 minutes ago
      No FDA authorization I guess
  • riazrizvi 5 minutes ago
    So she was merely ahead of her time.
    • yreg 3 minutes ago
      The use case was never the problem. The problem was that it did not work.
    • Forgeties79 2 minutes ago
      That silly patch idea?
  • petesergeant 40 minutes ago
    I thought this was going to be a non-invasive sugar-level device, but it looks like in fact the innovation here is that a popular CGM line can now do ketones?
    • ijustlovemath 25 minutes ago
      non-invasive continuous blood sugar measurement is mired in patents and technical challenges. Turns out it's really difficult to disambiguate the absorption lines of glucose from other similarly shaped molecules when you're also dealing with untangling skin conductivity, transmissivity, sweat, inflammation etc.
      • johen8 9 minutes ago
        I also think there's no financial incentive from incumbents to develop something like this. Why would abbott develop something that works "forever" if they can milk people buying new sensors every 10~14 days.
    • jakefromstatecs 24 minutes ago
      Seems to be the case, yeah
  • ck2 1 hour ago
    bet marathoners and ultra runners will start using this to improve performance

    (don't have a problem with that, but it's predictable)

    too bad it's not "wearable" like a watch but that might be coming eventually too since Garmin has a patent on it

    * https://the5krunner.com/2026/02/06/garmin-non-invasive-blood...

    (btw Fenix 9 launched today but it's same hardware as Fenix 8 and no glucose feature)

    • mikestew 12 minutes ago
      There has been talk, but as one who hangs around those circles I've not heard of anyone actually doing it. But I'm sure someone is. At the same time, what I'm reading is that CGM won't give a non-diabetic any actionable information.
      • ijustlovemath 7 minutes ago
        a regulated blood sugar level aids massively in cellular repair, inflammation reduction, and immune response. These are well studied and established. I could absolutely see a top athlete using AID in the future as part of a recovery routine, but I can also understand reluctance to adopt anything new or weird.
    • francisofascii 8 minutes ago
      [delayed]
    • loeg 8 minutes ago
      > to improve performance

      How? Like, what is the mechanism where this is useful?

  • grahar64 23 minutes ago
    Looked after my son who has T1D for now 5 years, checked keytones maybe 20 times. Compared to blood glucose which we check look at every 5 minutes.

    Maybe this is more for Type 2 or other diabetes, or for people prone to DKA. Or it is for people with a working pancreas who think looking at their blood sugars (and now keytones) tells them something like soothsayers reading tea leaves